witch is better get keep first or nekro ??

i think better get nekro first in 1v1 to get yins

{[BRD]}DarK_LorD™ wrote:

i think better get nekro first in 1v1 to get yins

It's better to get Nekro first But not all player can do that since they are too scared to die while having 3 ronins, or 4 ronins but no rice for the throne.

anyway better get keep
then u can get utara taro and kill army

but nekro can do nothing if opponent have healers

hmmm

at wotw better keep at br better nekro ^^

NekRoManT wrote:

anyway better get keep
then u can get utara taro and kill army

but nekro can do nothing if opponent have healers

but utara and taro need 3 yin

and ? when enemy attacking ur base it's not hard to get yins

but if u concentrate only for get keep and enemy attack u will have not big army and cant get so many yin in that little time

The longer the game is and the bigger army the players get with tower etc. nekro get more useless

ok i thought for rush or any shorter game

the shorter the game is, i think nek will be more powerful and usefull

I think Nekro is better because in fact there is a good player in this game called "Nekromant"

hehehehe lol BEN

But really, I never use Nekro in early 1v1 game, only in a 2v2 or 3v3 game. Not even 3v3 because most 3v3, it's a rush game

I prefer to get keep 1st.. utaro is deadly against snipes which most opponents use.

Quote :

I prefer to get keep 1st.. utaro is deadly against snipes which most opponents use.

Snipes are deadly against utara too . But it think that keep is better choice than necromancer. Keep grants more possibilities to you, whereas necromancer isnt very useful in long game. Its easier to build keep and enjoy all benefits that shinja, vetkin, taro and utara bring to you instead of creating necromancer which good for nothing except tanking towers.